iGaming platform pricing and TCO
Pricing is mostly quote-based. The matrix states the recorded values and their limits; the worksheet then normalizes platform, content, sportsbook, payments, compliance, support, term, and exit costs.
Recorded pricing · no invented averages
Provider pricing transparency matrix
Models show possible charging structures; amount columns contain only scoped recorded values. Open the review for product, market, period, and commercial limitations.
| Provider | Transparency | Recorded models | Setup | Monthly | Revenue share | Launch timing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Altenar | Not recorded | Not confirmed | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Point timing Value not recorded Planning range Value not recorded |
| Aristocrat Interactive | Not recorded | Not confirmed | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Point timing Value not recorded Planning range 3-12 months |
| Bragg Gaming Group | Not recorded | Not confirmed | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Point timing Value not recorded Planning range 1-6 months |
| Delasport | Not recorded | Not confirmed | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Point timing Value not recorded Planning range Timing not confirmed across turnkey, PAM, casino, and API/SaaS deployments |
| EveryMatrix | Not recorded | Not confirmed | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Point timing Value not recorded Planning range 8-24 weeks |
| GiG (GiG Software) | Not recorded | Not confirmed | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Point timing Value not recorded Planning range 12-24 weeks |
| Kambi Group | Not recorded | Revenue share | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Group revenue includes fees linked to partner gaming revenue; operator-specific rates and bands remain contract-specific | Point timing New Turnkey Sportsbook deployment duration is unknown Planning range Provider-wide duration is unknown across Turnkey, Odds Feed+, Managed Trading, PAM, and front-end scopes |
| Light & Wonder (iGaming) | Not recorded | Not confirmed | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Point timing Value not recorded Planning range 1-6 months |
| Pariplay | Not recorded | Not confirmed | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Point timing Fusion integration duration is unknown Planning range Provider-wide duration is unknown across operator platforms, jurisdictions, and content scopes |
| Playtech | Not recorded | Revenue share | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Revenue share is a recorded Playtech B2B model; the percentage and basis are contract-specific | Point timing Value not recorded Planning range 3-12 months |
| SOFTSWISS | Not recorded | Not confirmed | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Point timing Value not recorded Planning range Value not recorded |
| BetConstruct | On request | Not confirmed | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Point timing Value not recorded Planning range 4-12 weeks |
| Digitain | On request | Not confirmed | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Point timing Timing not confirmed for the turnkey sportsbook Planning range Timing not confirmed across turnkey, API, iFrame, and Centrivo configurations |
| GR8 Tech | On request | Not confirmed | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Point timing Value not recorded Planning range Timing not confirmed across Hyper Turnkey and Crypto Turnkey deployments |
| NuxGame | On request | Not confirmed | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Point timing Value not recorded Planning range 2-8 weeks |
| Slotegrator | On request | Not confirmed | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Point timing Value not recorded Planning range 2-4 months |
| Soft2Bet | On request | Not confirmed | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Value not recorded | Point timing Value not recorded Planning range Value not recorded |
Build total cost from the deployment architecture
A provider-level rate is not enough. Cost follows the exact legal entities, products, markets, brands, environments, volumes, dependencies, service model, contract term, and exit obligations.
Six normalization rules for supplier bids
- Rule 1Use one currency, one FX date, and an explicit tax treatment for every proposal.Use one currency, one FX date, and an explicit tax treatment for every proposal.
- Rule 2Model at least low, base, and high scenarios with the same actives, deposits, stakes, GGR, NGR deductions, transactions, brands, markets, and environments.Model at least low, base, and high scenarios with the same actives, deposits, stakes, GGR, NGR deductions, transactions, brands, markets, and environments.
- Rule 3Separate supplier fees from studio, data, cloud, PSP, KYC, geolocation, testing, licensing, and market-access pass-throughs.Separate supplier fees from studio, data, cloud, PSP, KYC, geolocation, testing, licensing, and market-access pass-throughs.
- Rule 4Write the exact GGR or NGR definition, deductions waterfall, negative carry, jackpots, bonuses, gaming taxes, chargebacks, and bad debt before applying a percentage.Write the exact GGR or NGR definition, deductions waterfall, negative carry, jackpots, bonuses, gaming taxes, chargebacks, and bad debt before applying a percentage.
- Rule 5Keep one-time, fixed recurring, usage, minimum, and revenue-share charges in separate columns. Do not hide a minimum inside the effective rate.Keep one-time, fixed recurring, usage, minimum, and revenue-share charges in separate columns. Do not hide a minimum inside the effective rate.
- Rule 6Price the exit while negotiating entryPrice the exit while negotiating entry: exports, retained access, assistance days, third-party consent, transition environment, and early-termination amounts.
The scenario table the supplier must complete
Duplicate the same baseline for low, base, and high cases. The downloaded CSV keeps amount type, unit, minimum, revenue basis, pass-through, assumption, source, contract schedule, and owner in separate fields.
| Input family | Low | Base | High | Contract definition required |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scale | Lower actives / deposits / stakes | Approved operating plan | Stress and growth case | Metric owner, source, period, currency, and tax basis |
| Platform | Fixed + included usage | Fixed + expected usage | Fixed + overage | Unit, included volume, overage rate, indexation, minimum |
| Revenue share | Downside economics | Expected waterfall | Upside and volume bands | GGR/NGR formula, deductions, negative carry, step-down |
| Third parties | Committed minimum scope | Expected providers and services | Full market/product scope | Pass-through markup, FX, tax, reconciliation, termination |
| Exit | Orderly expiry | Planned migration | Early or stressed exit | Export, assistance, environment, open items, termination fee |
Interactive buyer worksheet
Normalize a quoted term without inserting market averages
Enter the amounts already derived from one proposal's exact commercial definitions. The calculator keeps entry, fixed, third-party, support, variable, and exit costs visible across low, base, and high scenarios, then checks whether eight required quote lines are actually resolved.
| Scenario | Monthly recurring | Recurring over term | Entry + exit | Total cost | Effective monthly |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | €0 | €0 | €0 | €0 | €0 |
| Base | €0 | €0 | €0 | €0 | €0 |
| High | €0 | €0 | €0 | €0 | €0 |
Quote gap profile
Mark a line only when its amount, basis, scope, dependencies, exception, owner, and contract destination are explicit. A zero amount still needs a contractual definition.
Pricing and TCO questions
How much does an iGaming platform cost?
No comparable market-wide price is recorded. Product scope, jurisdiction, delivery model, volumes, content, trading, payments, compliance, service level, term, and exit rights determine the total. Compare complete proposals against the same scenario model.
Is revenue share cheaper than a monthly platform fee?
Not by definition. The answer depends on the percentage, GGR or NGR basis, deductions, minimums, volume bands, third-party costs, term, and forecast distribution. Model both the expected case and downside or upside cases using the exact contract waterfall.
Why does the table show “Value not recorded” instead of a number?
No comparable value is recorded for that provider and field. Contract-specific amounts, industry averages, and unscoped sales estimates are excluded.
What is the biggest hidden cost in a platform quote?
There is no universal single hidden cost. Common comparison failures are omitted third-party pass-throughs, minimum commitments, NGR deductions, migration work, non-production environments, support tiers, certification, and exit assistance.
Can the worksheet replace financial or legal diligence?
No. It creates a normalized buyer model and an audit trail. Finance, tax, legal, regulatory, security, operations, and product owners still need to validate assumptions and move accepted terms into the contract schedules.